If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. From February 8, 2013 to 04:50 on February 8, 2013, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s business operation by force for about one hour and 20 minutes, such as having the victim D, who was under the jurisdiction of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C, perform alcohol without any justifiable reason, and having his/her employees “to bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit,” and having his/her employees

2. The Defendant causing property damage, at the time, at the above paragraph (1) and time, and at the above places, flashed the toilet door, and walked the toilet door, thereby impairing the utility of the property which was damaged by destroying the market’s aesthetic property by destroying one meter in width and one meter in length from the outside wall of the toilet.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police officer on F;

1. Application of video-related Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;