If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On November 26, 2012, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victims by openly pointing out false information by publicly pointing out the following facts to the head of the above apartment guard group G, despite the fact that the victim D and E had not arbitrarily disposed of the solid water collected from the apartment. However, the Defendant’s statement to the effect that “The apartment security guards D and E sold solid water from the water surface, and sold them with the d’s vehicle.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, F, and G;

1. Application of the police statement-related Acts and subordinate statutes to F;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;