채권의공정한추심에관한법률위반등
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
The Defendants respectively.
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A from January 2012, 201 to the first police officer of the same year
9. By December 24, 200, from the Loan Business Office run by the Defendant, the principal is to be repaid to the victim E and the telephone was repeatedly phoneed each day without justifiable reasons.
On September 19, 2012, at around 09:55, the Defendant sent a text message to the victim’s mobile phone, “I am completely fladsing down on this day, ambened, ambened, ambened, ambened,” and continued on September 24, 2012, the Defendant expressed that “I ambened about whether I ambened, I ambened, I ambened, ambened, I ambened,” and expressed that “I ambened, I ambened, ambened, I amben
2. Around December 23, 2011, Defendant B threatened the victim E at the underground parking lot of the Yeongdeungpo-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, with “I wish to pay the principal as soon as possible.” On the other hand, I wish to talk with the president of Neman Hospital. The vehicle also changed, and if I would not respond to the request, I would like to find the victim.”
The Defendant, as such, was delivered a G Posing vehicle at the market price of KRW 15 million to the victim who frighted the victim and frighted the victim.
3. The Defendants, on August 7, 2012, had the intent to recover the vehicles offered as security from the 19:36th to the 21:29th day of the same day on the grounds that the victim E did not repay the loans at the G apartment 101 underground parking lot in the G apartment 101-dong, Young-gu, Young-gu, Seoul.
Defendant
A directed Defendant B to have the said vehicle with the Iland that the victim parked in the said place, and accordingly Defendant B brought the said vehicle to Defendant B by towing the said vehicle using Bosch Rexroth, thereby bringing the vehicle owned by the victim equivalent to KRW 20 million at the market price.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to steal the victim's vehicle.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants each of the third trial records.