대부업등의등록및금융이용자보호에관한법률위반등
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal does not contain any interest agreement by lending money to D, nor there is no interest received from D, and there is no intimidation by collecting money from D.
Defendant
B There is no interest agreement by lending money to D, or there is no interest from D on the pretext of advance interest, etc.
In addition, the Defendants did not recover the principal from D properly.
Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendants guilty of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. The judgment of the court below is based on the fact that the defendants are running a credit business with no registration, and even if they are running a credit business, they lent money without interest agreement to D who is the borrower.
In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendants' assertion that the defendants did not receive interest or that it is difficult to accept, D's investigative agency and statement in the court below correspond to the facts charged, and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below is sufficient. Thus, the court below's decision that the defendants guilty of the facts charged in this case against the defendants is just, and there is no error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misconception of facts.
3. Accordingly, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.