However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has reported a marriage to E on October 17, 1985. A is a person who is a spouse.

On December 2, 2007, the Defendant sent B with B one time a car parked in a factory lot located in the 4th Industrial Complex Corporation located in the Simsi-si, Simsi-si, Simpo-si, Simpo-si, Simpo-si.

B. On November 6, 2009, the Defendant sent sexual intercourse with B and once at the GMotone room located in the Gui-si F at night.

C. On January 1, 2009, at around 16:30 on the date, the Defendant respondedd with B one time from the HMotone’s care room located in the Sinsi F. D.

On November 21, 2009, the Defendant 1:30 on November 21, 2009, the U.S.A., located in the U.S.-dong area near the 4 U.S. Industrial Complex Corporation, was parked in B with the Defendant’s car in the vicinity of the 4.

E. The Defendant Ra at night on December 10, 209.

At the same place as paragraph B, B and once sexual intercourse was made.

F. The Defendant Ra at night on December 14, 2009.

At the same place as paragraph B, B and once sexual intercourse was made.

In this respect, the defendant was sent to B more than six times.

2. Defendant B, even though he was aware that he was a spouse who has completed a marriage report with Party A, had sexual intercourse with Party A at the same time and place as Party A’s (A).

In this respect, the defendant was 7 times more than 6 times between A and A.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants by the prosecution

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A complaint;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (the confirmation of the progress of divorce lawsuit);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime: Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants in the suspension of execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da15488, Apr. 2, 2007);