A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, by imprisonment of Defendant B for two years, and by a fine of KRW 1 million.

To the extent that the facts charged in the indictment do not disadvantage the defendants' exercise of their right to defense, some correction or correction was made according to the facts obtained through the examination of evidence.

1. The Defendants’ identity is a person who holds part of the shares in the name of his father in relation to the building E and the company located in the Fho Lake Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”), Defendant B is the chairperson of the International Building in Jung-gu, Seoul and K, an incorporated association located in J (hereinafter “K”), and Defendant C is a person who operates the N Co., Ltd. in the Seosan Seo-gu L Building and M (hereinafter “N”).

2. Since 2011, the Korea Manpower Agency under the Korea Manpower Agency under the Korea Manpower Agency’s Ministry of Labor (hereinafter “victims Agency”) operated the O business (hereinafter “the instant business”). The instant business was supported by the National Treasury for the purpose of providing employees belonging to small and medium enterprises, etc., who do not have self-education personnel and facilities, with opportunities to undergo continuous and systematic education and training by utilizing training centers owned by the operating institutions, such as large enterprises and organizations of business entities, to provide employees belonging to small and medium enterprises, etc., with opportunities to undergo continuous and systematic education and training. As of the date of 2014, approximately KRW 1,31.4 billion subsidies were provided to the 151 operating institutions.

The instant project is granted a subsidy on the condition that the operating institution shall pay at least 20% of the project cost as its own charge in order to achieve the business goals that provide workers in small business places with an opportunity for continuous and systematic education and training, and to prevent the moral hazard of the consortium operating institution.

3. On June 3, 2011, K interference with Defendant A and B’s tender in 201 with the aim of supporting the education of workers engaged in the film industry from the Victim Service.