beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.14 2018고단543

무고

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 25, 2017, the Defendant made a sexual intercourse with E at D points located in Suwon-si C, Suwon-si, with a view to cutting off E’s hand around 23:55 on the same day and holding about about 1 hour and 10 minutes at Gel for about 200 meters at the same Gu F, and had sexual intercourse with E under an agreement.

However, the defendant returned home on the following day and was asked to hold a kismark in the part of his parent and the fact that he did not have any contact with his parent.

In order to see the spirit of alcohol, clothes were off in any Moel.

The key marks in the House were left behind in the House.

“A false statement,” and the Defendant’s reference to this belief was reported to 11:23 on the same day and 112 on the same day.

For the purpose of having E criminal punishment, the Defendant is not able to associate with his/her mind at the police station of the Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Suwon Park Jong-gu, 199 on the same day, as the Defendant, whether he/she was off his/her mind at the police station of the Suwon-gu, the Suwon-gu, the Suwon-gu, the Suwon-gu, the Suwon-gu, who was 199 on the same day.

A statement to the effect that the situation in which the wife was in force under this item is not well memory shall be prepared and submitted, and the victim’s statement statement is received from 18:00 on the 27th of the same month from 18:00 to 1, and there is no memory accompanying her mother to her.

눈을 떴는데 상의는 E 와 둘 다 벗고 있었다.

First, even if there is no mental mind with the male in the first place, the deceased shall be found to have been dead.

I do not think that I have consented to the horses.

The first experience is also kismark, and the body has become more satisfy and satisfy.

E is intended for punishment of E.

“The fact,” however, was sexual intercourse under the agreement with E on the premise of the teaching system.

Accordingly, the defendant reported false facts to public offices and made a false accusation.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;