The punishment against A shall be 500,000 won, and the punishment against Defendant B shall be 4 months, respectively.

Defendant .

Defendant

A is the representative director of a limited liability company C who carries out plant construction and steel structure construction business, and Defendant B is the kind and kind of business of the above A and a person in charge of fund management and construction-related affairs as the regular director of the above company.

1. Defendant B obtained approval of the use of the building of a limited liability company C, which had been extended with permission for extension to Yong-gun D as of October 17, 2012, and obtained approval of the use of the building from the Small and Medium Business Corporation as collateral. Defendant B got loans of approximately KRW 1 billion from the Small and Medium Business Corporation as collateral. Since the existing extension permission granted on March 19, 2009 on the above D remains without cancellation of the existing extension permission granted on March 19, 2009, Defendant B was placed in a situation in which it is impossible to obtain loans as scheduled as soon as the above building did not obtain the approval of the use of the building. Accordingly, Defendant B was bound to have failed to properly perform its duties from Defendant A.

Accordingly, Defendant B had the date of issuance of the certificate of the personal seal impression issued by E at the time of purchasing cras, etc. from the above E, forged the certificate of the personal seal impression issued by E, and attempted to cancel the existing building permit of E using it.

On November 29, 2012, Defendant B altered the official document with a “11” computer from C office located in Yong-gun F, Youngnam, and printed out the paper to “11,” and attached the “8” on the date of issuance of the E’s certificate of personal seal impression, which was kept as above, on the “8th August 17, 2012,” and revised one copy of E’s certificate of personal seal impression, which is the official document, in the name of the officer in charge of the electronic data management office of the National Court Administration.

B. On November 29, 2012, Defendant B forged private documents under the title of “wons for revocation of building permits” using computers at the offices listed in the above paragraph (a) around November 29, 2012, and “YAAE D” in the applicant’s address column, “(state) E representative director G in the applicant column, and “YAAE D” in the site location column.