However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 15, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million with a fine of KRW 5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Suwon District Court on September 15, 2006 and a fine of KRW 2 million with the same crime at the same court on July 30, 2010.

On August 2, 2014, at around 21:00, the Defendant driven a BF car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.095% in the section of approximately 3K m of alcohol from around 21:03 on the same day before the restaurant in which it is impossible to know the trade name in the administrative Ri of the local government of the local government of the local government of the Republic of Korea on August 2, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Report on the status of the driver;

1. A reply to inquiries, such as criminal records;

1. Application of each summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act ( considered for the favorable reasons among the reasons for probation under the following year);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant was punished for driving 5 times on the five-time basis, but it is not good to commit a crime by again driving fright

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act to attend lectures;