When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On January 12, 2014, at the main point of “D” located on the second floor of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building C, the Defendant and B was unable to avoid a small amount of 30 minutes when the victim E (29 years old) who is the above main manager of the instant main store (29 years old) expressed a request for the settlement of accounts on the grounds that the victim E (29 years old) was able to take a bath for the reason that, while calculating the drinking value at the location of “D” on the second floor of the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building C, he was able to avoid a large amount of 30 minutes on the ground that the victim E (a person aged 29 years old) was able

As above, the Defendant conspired with B to prevent customers entering the above main points from entering, and thereby interfered with the victim’s main points operation by force.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) and B jointly carried out the same time, at the same place, at the same time, and at the same place as the preceding paragraph, and as above, the victim F (24 years of age) and the victim G (19 years of age) were prevented. The Defendant was tightly pushed the victim F’s breath, and the Defendant was able to carry the victim F’s face by drinking, with the victim’s face being hacked and hacked. The Defendant was able to walk the victim’s face at a hand, walking the victim’s face and walking the breath, walking the breath part requiring two weeks medical treatment, and the victim F suffered injury, such as damage to the breath part requiring two-day medical treatment, and the breath part that requires two-day medical treatment.

3. The Defendants engaged in obstruction of performance of official duties arrested Defendant B as a flagrant offender at the time, at the same time, at the place as set forth in Paragraph (1) and at the same time, and at the 112 report and arrested Defendant B as a police offender. B, while taking a bath as “the dubling of the police officer inside his body”, the Defendants committed assault, such as taking the dubling of the police officer, and preventing B from carrying the police officer’s arms onto the police station while getting off.

In collusion with B, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a police officer in the act of committing an offense.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Some of the interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Each police officer with respect to E, G, and F.