2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be postponed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On October 22, 2014, at around 03:25, the Defendant proceeded along the front road of one Flain Building, located in 27, sloping-ro, sloping-gu, Sungnam-gu, in accordance with three-lanes from the glock ginseng to the 5-lane mix.

Since there is an area to enter an intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to check the safety of the course by properly examining whether there is a vehicle waiting for signal at the front of the course, and to accurately manipulate the steering direction, brake system, etc. and to proceed with it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to accurately operate the brake system, thereby resulting in the Defendant’s fault in driving the victim D(51 years of age) who stops in the signal atmosphere at the front of the said vehicle, thereby putting the part behind the k7 taxi and the front part of the said vehicle.

결국, 피고인은 위와 같은 업무상의 과실로 피해자에게 약 3주간의 치료가 필요한 경추의 염좌 및 긴장 등의 상해를 입게 하고, 분당경찰서 F지구대 소속 경장 G로부터 피고인에게서 술 냄새가 나고 얼굴에 홍조를 띠는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할 이유가 상당히 있어 같은 날 03:51경부터 04:13경까지 약 20분간에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았음에도 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

2. Legal statement of witness G;

3. Written statements of D;

4. A traffic accident report (1) (2) and a report on the status of the drinking driver;

5. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act;