A. On November 1, 2010, the Plaintiff (formerly changed: Tyman Loan Co., Ltd.) received from the Social Loan Co., Ltd. on November 1, 2010 the claims based on the judgment of the Seoul Central District Court 2008Gahap127 transfer amount (hereinafter “prior judgment”) against the Defendants of the Social Loan Co., Ltd., Ltd., which took over the claims based on the asset sales contract as of October 20, 201, and received the notification of the assignment of claims.

B. On May 27, 2016, the Plaintiff sent a notice of assignment to the Defendants, but each of the notice did not reach the Defendants on the grounds that directors are unknown.

C. A duplicate of the instant complaint containing the purport of the Plaintiff’s notification of assignment of claims reaches Defendant A and C on December 22, 2016, and Defendant B on July 5, 2016.

[Grounds for recognition] The descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts acknowledged prior to the determination of the cause of the claim, the Seoul Central District Court official, etc., with respect to the preceding judgment, shall grant the execution clause to the Plaintiff, a successor to the same social company, for compulsory execution against the Defendants.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.