beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.12.09 2020나12004

자재납품대금

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

Claim:

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court’s acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following additional judgment parts, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence

- The defendant asserts that the defendant's application of 12% per annum or 15% delay damages from the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case is erroneous, although there were reasonable grounds to dispute about the existence and scope of the performance obligation prior to the pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance.

In the first instance court, the Defendant made several arguments and defenses in the first instance court, but all of them were not accepted, and this court affirmed the first instance judgment, so it is difficult to view that it is reasonable to dispute over the existence and scope of the Defendant’s obligation.

It cannot be said that there was an error in the judgment of the first instance applying 12% per annum or 15% delay damages as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the day following the delivery of the duplicate of

2. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.