However, each of the two years from the date of the final judgment against the Defendants.

Defendant

B is a person who operates a "Dmaz" in the 3th floor of Ansan-si, and the defendant A is a person who has worked there as an employee.

1. On March 15, 2016, Defendant A received KRW 110,00 from the police officer who pretended to be a customer in the “Dma place” as the price for marina and sexual traffic, and arranged to engage in sexual traffic with female E.

2. On March 15, 2016, Defendant B, an employee, issued KRW 110,00 to a police officer who pretended to be a customer in the “Dma” and arranged to engage in sexual traffic with a female in sexual traffic, as well as arranging one to engage in sexual traffic with a female in sexual traffic, from June 11, 2015 to March 15, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. E statements;

1. Application of statutes governing field control photographs;

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Defendant A who choose to imprisonment: The punishment of acts of arranging sexual traffic, Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of an order of community service: Consideration of the following facts: The Defendants, as the siblings for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, conspired to operate a sexual traffic business establishment; Defendant A had the history of having received a disposition of suspending indictment for the same crime; the period of operation