2. In full view of the records and arguments of this case, including the fact that the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, repeated behaviors during the period of repeated crimes, the victim's degree of damage is several times, the victim's damage is not substantial, and the damage is not recovered, and other various circumstances, such as the circumstances of the crime of this case, the means and method thereof, the circumstances after the crime, and the defendant's age and happiness environment, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, are too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.