However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2016. 7. 29. 22:40경 대전 중구 B에 있는 'C식당' 앞에서 “대문 앞에 소변을 본 사람을 처벌해 달라”는 112신고를 받고 출동한 대전중부경찰서 D지구대 소속 순경 E으로부터 "양해를 구하겠습니다. 선생님들 가운데 노상에서 소변을 본 사람이 있나요 "라는 질문을 받자 "이 새끼 표정이 좃 같네, 말투가 좃 같네, 너 몇 살 먹었냐 "라고 욕설을 하며 양손으로 피해자의 멱살을 잡고 수 회 흔드는 등 폭행하여 112신고처리에 관한 경찰관의 정당한 공무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of case, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing damage photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence shall be determined as per the order, comprehensively taking into account the following factors: (a) there is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence]; (b) the degree of violence against police officers (decision of sentence); (c) the Defendant’s first offender is against the police officer; (d) the Defendant’s first offender is against the police officer; and (e) the circumstances of the instant crime; (e) the Defendant’s age, character