beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.09.06 2015고단1034

사기

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From September 2007 to January 2009, Defendant A subscribed eight insurance products, such as the victim C, etc., for which the daily amount of hospitalization per the number of hospitalization days overlaps, during the period of hospitalization.

Although it is possible for the Defendant to purchase multiple insurance policies as above, he was able to provide long-term hospitalized treatment and receive insurance money, and the Defendant was able to receive the above insurance money from February 11, 2009 to April 17, 2009. Despite the absence of a need to receive long-term hospitalized treatment at the E hospital located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si for 66 days from February 11, 2009, the Defendant hospitalized the victim C corporation with a side signboard, claiming insurance money of KRW 1,890,000 on April 20, 2009, and received the above insurance money on May 11, 2009.

The Defendant, including that, from around that time to September 2, 2013, received insurance money of KRW 226,683,622 by deceiving the victim insurance company as shown in the attached Table 1 list of crimes.

2. From June 2007 to September 2008, Defendant B subscribed to four insurance products of the victim C, etc., for which the daily amount of hospitalization per the number of hospitalization days overlaps during the period of hospitalization.

The Defendant hospitalized the above E hospital for a long period of 65 days from September 1, 2008 to November 4, 2008, even though there was no need for the long-term hospitalized treatment at the above E hospital, such as knee-fee-fee-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe

The Defendant, including that, from around that time to September 3, 2013, received insurance money of KRW 114,059,927 by deceiving the victim insurance companies in the same manner as in attached Table 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the witness F in the fourth and fifth public trial records;

1. Each statement of the witness G and H in the sixth public trial records;

1. Statement made by the witness I in the seventh public trial records;

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect by some prosecutors against the Defendants

1. Defendant A, respectively.