However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2015. 12. 9. 01:55 경 충북 E에 있는 F가 운영하는 G 주점 5 호실에서, 피고인이 영업이 끝났음에도 위 노래 연습장에서 나가지 않는다는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 옥천 경찰서 H 지구대 소속 경찰관 I과 경찰관 J로부터 노래 연습장에서 나갈 것을 요구 받자, 술에 만취하여 “ 야 이 새끼야. 꺼져 이 미친 놈 아.” 라는 등의 욕설을 하면서 발로 I의 배를 1회 찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting management duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to I, J and F;

1. A statement prepared in F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the place of the offender, arrest report of the occurrence of the case, place of employment (B), investigation report (any document attached to the statement of the processing of the reported case)

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for the crime (elective of imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1548, Apr. 1, 2

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of protection observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act or more;