Where the above fine is not paid, one million won shall be converted into one day.

On February 12, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-gu branch on May 22, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 22, 2015.

On September 23, 2014, at around 00:05, the Defendant took the taxi platform in front of the C Hospital in Kimcheon-si B, and made a false statement that “the Defendant would pay the victim a fare on the fluence to the fluence of the fluence.”

However, the Defendant did not have the ability or intent to pay taxi expenses even if the Defendant was to pay the Defendant to the destination because of the lack of money at the time.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was provided with taxi operation services from the victim, and did not pay 15,000 won, thereby acquiring property benefits.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Previous records of judgment: A copy of the judgment bound in the records of public trial and the application of statutes on the inspection of Konet case;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines (Partial reduction, in consideration of the fact that damage is insignificant and the amount of damage is insignificant and the taxi fee is fully agreed with the victim and the fact that it falls under the latter concurrent crimes);

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;