beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.06.08 2016고단2849

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is in a de facto marital relationship with E, the victim's wife, and has served as the regular director of the F. of the Bank of Korea.

1. Fraud;

A. On October 1, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, on the face of 120 million won, sent a phone to the victim and received the scrap metal and the scrap metal emitted from G around December 26, 2015, and, from January 1, 2016 to February 2016, the Defendant concluded a contract with the victim to receive the scrap metal and the scrap metal from G.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to cause the victim to receive the scrap metal and the non-performance thereof, or the defendant did not have the intent or ability to cause the contract to be sexually terminated.

Nevertheless, on October 21, 2015, the Defendant, as seen above, received money from the injured party to his own agricultural bank account with KRW 120,000,000,000 in the name of the contract and acquired it by defrauded.

B. On June 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the restaurant called DI located in the G, SI on May 10, 2016, the Defendant: (b) paid money to the Defendant for the use of seal as the head office in Seoul, because the Defendant was under a contract for the release of scrap iron and non-refinites with the victim.

A false statement was made to the effect that “the amount of KRW 30 million is changed.”

However, the Defendant was unaware of the J, and the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay money for expenses, and was planning to use the said money in the name of personal debt repayment.

Nevertheless, the defendant made such a false statement and acquired it by receiving 30 million won in cash from the damaged person on the same day.

2. Forging a private document;

A. On October 5, 2015, the Defendant, using a computer in the office of a credit branch in the K-based K-based K-based K-based K-based K-based K-based K-based K-based K-based K-based K-based K-based K-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L-based L