However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 23, 2018, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act from the Jeju District Court.

Although the Defendant was a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act, at around 20:55 on August 9, 2019, the Defendant driven a Flearning car while under the influence of alcohol of about 0.138% in the section of approximately 2km alcohol content from the 3rd day of Jeju to the front day of E in Jeju Island.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the statement of the situation of a drinking driver, investigation report (report on the status of a drinking driver), inquiry into the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, and related photographs;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of criminal records of the same kind of suspect);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order of Education and the Order of Community Service include: (a) the defendant's mistake and reflects the defendant's mistake; (b) the criminal records of the same kind of fine are twice the criminal records of the defendant; and (c) the degree of taking the punishment is not less than that of the defendant; and (d) the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, means and result of the crime; and (e) the various sentencing