However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Although the Defendant is not a person dealing with Chinese nationality, the Defendant treated the Mepter (hereinafter referred to as “philopon”) as follows, which is a local mental medicine, even though he is not a person dealing with narcotics.

1. The Defendant and D conspired to purchase phiphones, and D gave the Defendant KRW 200,000 of the purchase fund of phiphones, while the Defendant is mixed with the “E” and the “J” in the indictment of “E” on the sexual lusity of phiphones sold by phiphones known to the Defendant, but the Defendant is unified into the “E”.

They promised to deal with philophones by telephone.

On July 27, 2017, at around 21:00, the Defendant: (a) was fluored by a male with approximately KRW 0.75 gh of philophones and delivered KRW 200,000 in cash, from a male who cannot have known that the “E” was sent in front of G in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with D to purchase philophones.

2. Intermediation of trade of phiphones;

A. Since the Defendant’s “K” in his third degree of indictment appears to be a clerical error in H’s “H” through D (see, e.g., evidence records 160, 164, 179) ex officio correction is made.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

Upon the request of the said “E” to seek a philopon, the volume of the philopon trade, the amount of the trade, and the place of the trade of the philopon were determined and issued by H 90,000 won of the philopon purchase price.

On August 8, 2017, at around 20:30, the Defendant: (a) sent “E” in front of the above G on the street; (b) 3 plastic bags consisting of approximately 2g plasticphones; and (c) paid KRW 90,000 in cash.

Since then, the defendant immediately delivered the above philophone to D, and D delivers it to H.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with D to arrange the purchase of H’s phiphones.

B. On August 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) asked the said “E to seek phiphones from H around 20:00; (b) determined the volume of phiphones traded, trading amount, and place of trade; and (c) KRW 2.5 million for phiphones purchased from H.