2. The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Defendant

A The president of the FF Co., Ltd. in Ansan-si, who was in charge of the above agricultural cooperative's subsidy project, and Defendant B was the chief agent in charge of the above agricultural cooperative's subsidy project, and the Defendants, who was appointed by the FFF as the subsidized project operator of the 2012 FTA fund and the project for the installation of high quality facilities from each farmer to whom the FFF was delegated with the duties of application for subsidies and receipt of subsidies from each farmer and the project for the installation of high quality facilities from the victim's awareness viewing around March 2012, the Defendants solicited the subcontractor and the construction project to receive subsidies by deceiving the victim by applying for subsidies.

As a result, with respect to the construction work for the construction work for the above-mentioned 20-year construction project, the Defendants paid 5,469,00 won for the total construction work for G workers (subsidies of KRW 27,734,00, KRW 16,640,00 for loans of KRW 11,05,00 for self-payment), KRW 51,215,00 for the total construction work for the same H (subsidies of KRW 25,607,000 for loans of KRW 15,360,00 for self-payment of KRW 10,00 for 10,248,000 for self-payment of KRW 205,00 for the above-mentioned construction work, KRW 69,831,00 for the total construction work of KRW 20,00 for KRW 305,00 for the above-mentioned construction work (the total construction work charges of KRW 130,000 for KRW 360,004,000 for each construction work

However, in fact, the FFFC chain.