beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.04.30 2013고단153

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. C’s act of violating the restriction on vehicle operation on February 27, 2002, which is the employee of the defendant specified in the facts charged, on the road in front of the Ulsan Industrial Complex around February 27, 2002. 2. The penal provisions applicable to the summary order subject to review on December 29, 201 shall retroactively lose its effect pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality [the Constitutional Court Decision 2011Hun-Ga24, October 28, 2010, Supreme Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga38, October 28, 2010, Supreme Court Decision 2008Hun-Ga17, July 30, 2009]. Thus, the defendant shall be acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.