However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant, from March 3, 2009 to March 31, 2014, engaged in textile trade business with C, and became aware of the victim E through the introduction of GWD in 2012.

On July 2012, the Defendant concluded that, at the office of D in Daegu-gu, the Defendant purchased the 2% interest per month from the profits of the purchase of the 150 million Won with the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives and the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives and the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives of the nives and the nives of the

However, the defendant was operated at the time of fact

Since C was at the risk of default due to the debt amounting to KRW 400 million, it was thought that the debt was repaid from the damaged party, and it was not an intention or ability to export by purchasing the debt with borrowed money.

Around August 1, 2012, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred KRW 150 million to an enterprise bank account in the name of the Defendant to the account in the name of the Defendant on the pretext of borrowing from the victim.

"2017 Highest 5509"

1. The Defendant, on July 11, 2013, purchased the source of supply to the Victim H, “100,000,000 won, which would be supplied to the Home Shopping on the face of the State,” at the C factory office located in the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G of the G.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to purchase the original body.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was transferred KRW 10,00,000 to the Daegu Bank Account (J) in the name of the victim on the same day as the purchase cost of the original group from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property from the victim by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant is in charge of the victim C’s overseas business from November 1, 2012 to the Gyeongdong-do, the Defendant is in charge of the victim C’s overseas business.