A. As to Defendant B’s KRW 858,00,000 and KRW 40,000 among them, Defendant B shall be from November 1, 2013 to 223,000.

A. Defendant B and Defendant F’s joint tort related to Defendant B’s joint tort are a person who was working for the president of J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “J”) after having an office in the first 11th floor in Seoul Gwangjin-gu, Seoul. Defendant F is a person who jointly operates Defendant C with Defendant E and G with the second floor in Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

When Defendant B knew that the Plaintiff was an operator of a manufacturing company of clothes and subsidiary materials, Defendant B, upon being aware of the fact that the Plaintiff was an operator of a business of operating a manufacturing company of clothing and subsidiary materials, recommended the Plaintiff to lend funds to Defendant C, which is operated by Defendant F, and received a certain portion of the interest from the Plaintiff as a commission, Defendant C received a fee from the Plaintiff, and Defendant C was willing to receive the fee for the above loan from the Plaintiff, and Defendant F had the intent or ability to pay the money even if the money was borrowed from the Plaintiff due to the foregoing financial shortage, Defendant B et al., followed Defendant B by borrowing the money from the Plaintiff while granting the fee to Defendant B, despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay it.

피고 B은 이러한 모의 하에 2013. 10. 하순경 서울 광진구 H에 있는 I 11층에 있는 자신의 사무실에서 원고에게 ‘피고 C라는 떡볶이 프랜차이즈 회사가 높은 수익을 올리고 있고 사업을 계속 확장하고 있다. 위 회사에 돈을 빌려주면 월 10%의 이자를 지급하겠다. 내가 위 회사의 경영 상황을 매일 살펴보고 있기 때문에 원금이 떼일 염려는 하지 않아도 된다’는 취지로 말하였다.

그러나 사실 피고 C는 당시 매월 수천만 원의 적자가 나고 있었고, 다수의 사람들로부터 월 10%의 수익을 보장하면서 떡볶이 프랜차이즈 사업 등에 대한 투자금 명목으로 2,000,000,000원 이상을 교부받은 후 그 투자금을 제대로 지급하지 못하고 있는 상황이었기 때문에 원고로부터 금원을 차용하더라도 이를...