근로기준법위반
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
The summary of the facts charged is the employer who has been engaged in construction business with 15 full-time workers as the representative of C Co., Ltd.
The Defendant had worked from May 7, 2007 to May 1, 2010 at the above workplace and had retired from D’s retirement allowance of KRW 6,643,680 from D, and had not paid KRW 6,680 within 14 days from the date of retirement without agreement between the parties on the extension of the due date. The Defendant had worked from July 13, 201 to October 4 of the same year at the above workplace and had not paid KRW 1,680,000 for E’s wages during the period of retirement within 14 days from the date of retirement without agreement on the extension of the due date between the parties.
Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act for Reasons for Rejection of Public Prosecution.