Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court is justifiable to have determined the Defendant guilty of the primary facts charged of the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In doing so, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “the state of non-rape” in the crime of quasi-rape.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.