However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 14:10 on January 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the convenience store management of the victim by force by avoiding the disturbance between approximately 20 minutes of the 20 minutes of the crypology at the convenience store, and thereby obstructing the victim’s convenience store management by force. (b) The Defendant: (c) viewed the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp; (d) the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement of M;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 314 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the accused repents his mistake, the circumstances leading to the crime, the degree of damage, etc.);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and order to attend the course of the crime of this case alleged to the effect that the defendant was in a state of mental or physical disability or mental disorder under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case. However, according to the records, the fact that the defendant

Since it seems that the defendant and his defense counsel are in a state or weak condition, the defendant and his defense counsel cannot be accepted.