On August 12, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution for fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court, which became final and conclusive on January 26, 2017.

On December 8, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would pay 100% of the principal and the investment amount as interest after eight months when he/she invested in the “C Complex Cultural Space Project” with the victim B about KRW 10 million (Korean Won KRW 100 million).

However, even if the defendant received 10 million UN from the victim, he invested in the project and did not think that he will pay the principal and interest to the victim.

Around January 11, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim by such a method, received 5 million UN from the victim as the primary investment money from the victim, and acquired 5 million UN from the victim at the same place as the victim on January 24, 2015, respectively for the second investment money.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. The content of conversation;

1. Details of bankbooks;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports (Attachment to the same type of judgment);

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 347 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing in the latter part of Articles 37 and 39(1) of the Criminal Act dealing with concurrent crimes is that the sentencing criteria is not applicable in the relationship between the previous offense in this case and the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act.

Although the investment amount is about KRW 10 million, damage was not completely recovered even though the investment amount is about KRW 10 million.

The defendant is a foreigner who is not the victim in Korean and is not the victim in Korean, and acquired the above money by taking advantage of the fact that the victim is not a foreigner in Korean situation, and the crime is bad.

The defendant denies the crime.

On or before the third day, the defendant was present at the public trial, but his departure from the Republic of Korea and his whereabouts were unknown, so the public trial was proceeded by service by public notice.

. The above.