beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.07.13 2017고단1289

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On March 20, 2016, the Defendant, on March 20, 2016, committed fraud, with the victim C at the Shindong-dong, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S.A. on March 20, 2016, saying, “The Defendant is required to make a stock investment, and the Defendant wishes to receive a refund upon lending money, only one month prior to any time and at any time, will return one copy of interest.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the debt of the Su million won even if he borrowed money from the damaged party due to the absence of any specific income.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 10,000,000 won from the victim under the pretext of borrowing the same day.

2. On April 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the place described in the preceding paragraph prior to April 27, 2016 at the time when the Defendant borrowed money to the said victim, “it is necessary to make any money to make an investment; and (b) at the time when he/she wishes to receive a refund from the lending of money, he/she shall return one copy of interest.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the debt of the Su million won even if he borrowed money from the damaged party due to the absence of any specific income.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was given the victim a total of KRW 5,00,000,000 for checks and cash in the name of the same day.

3. On May 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the place indicated in the preceding paragraph at around April 27, 2016 at the place; (b) on April 27, 2016, the Defendant borrowed money from the said victim; (c) on the one hand, the Defendant would lend money from the said victim; (d) he/she would lend money from the other party at his/her own expense; and (e) he/she would have paid three additional interest within three months.

In this case, it would have been repaid.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not request to lend money from the above E and thought that he made a stock investment by lending money, and there was a debt of several million won at the time and there is no particular income.