도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On July 15, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,00 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Daegu District Court Port Branch.
1. Around September 23:15, 2019, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by 0.039% in blood alcohol content, and the Defendant was driving the said vehicle at approximately 22 km in the section from the front side of the cafeteria “C” restaurant in Jin-si to D in the front side of Jin-si, through a road in front of Jin-si, to the front side of Jin-si, and continuously driving the FYFxa car at approximately 7km away from the 7km section, and continuously under the influence of alcohol by 0.031% on September 7, 2019 at around 05:28, while the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by 0.031% in front of the said apartment on the road, through H located in J in Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, 60 meters in the direction from the front side of the subway box in front of Jin-si.
Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving twice.
2. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a vehicle as specified in the preceding paragraph.
On September 6, 2019, at around 23:15, the Defendant driven the said car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.039% 0.039%, while driving the said car, and driving the front road D in front of the Jin-si in the direction of the west in the direction of the west.
In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering area and the steering system and accurately.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving the victim I (year 45) who was waiting for a U-turn in the front bank due to the negligence of neglecting this, and received the part of the Defendant’s driving on the left-hand side of the said car.
Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence above, destroyed a victim’s car to have approximately KRW 769,340 of the repair cost, and did not immediately stop the car and take necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1..