- The sum of KRW 66,800,000,000 (hereinafter “amount remitted to the Plaintiff”) was remitted from the national bank account in the name of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “stock company”) to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant, as indicated in the following table.

On January 30, 2013, 1,00,000, 26.2,000 on April 26, 2013, 200, 200,000 on May 16, 2013, 200, 3,000, 200 on March 4, 2013, 200, 30,000 on June 13, 200, 13,000 on June 3, 200, 200, 30,000, 13,000 on March 7, 200, 200, 200, 30,000 on March 12, 200, 300, 1308, 203;

(4) On July 16, 2013, KRW 10,000,00 was remitted under C’s name. The amount on the date (won) (including KRW 20,000,000 on January 7, 2013) shall be 10,000,000 on August 5, 2013, 200; KRW 10,000,00 on February 1, 2013; KRW 14,000,00 on August 22, 2013; KRW 64,00,000,000 on a total of KRW 64,00,000 on July 16, 2013; KRW 10,000 on a loan; KRW 200,000 on a loan; KRW 1,200 on a loan; KRW 10,000 on a loan; KRW 200,000 on a loan, 2004,000.3

The Plaintiff asserted that KRW 14,00,000 as of August 22, 2013 was the purchase price for DNA vehicles purchased by the Defendant from the Plaintiff, and the Defendant claimed that the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 14,000,000 as security, and that the Defendant did not pay KRW 14,00,000,000 even though the Defendant returned the NAS vehicle to the Plaintiff.

Judgment

As seen earlier, the Defendant paid KRW 14,00,000 to the Plaintiff on August 22, 2013, and Nos. 2 and 2.