Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 25,000 won shall be one day.

On February 14, 2017, the Defendant operated a video display device (or a four-way system in which Handphones are linked) while driving a B-vehicles around 15:25, while driving the main road with an inner area near the sub-section of the main road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The Defendant’s assertion of the witness C’s testimony is argued to the effect that, in light of the fact that the Defendant is allowed to use a portable phone without holding it in his/her hand without using a device that enables him/her to use the portable phone during driving, a portable phone may operate the video display device even during driving in a case where a portable phone is linked to a video display device. However, in light of the fact that Article 49(1)11-2 of the Road Traffic Act regulates the video display device separately from a portable phone in consideration of the risk of operating the video display device during driving, it is regulated separately from a portable phone.

corporation may operate a video display device while operating the video display device.

Therefore, the above argument is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 156 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 49 (1) 11-2 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;