On October 30, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of injury at the Daegu District Court on December 16, 2014, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on December 16, 2014. On February 12, 2013, the Seoul Southern District Court was sentenced to two years of suspended execution and fine of ten million won for the crime of injury, etc. on February 12, 2013. On December 17, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of ten million won for the crime of assault at the same court.

7. 23. Fines of two million won for the same crime, and the same year.

4. On January 27, 2012, the same court was sentenced to a fine of one million won for the crime of bodily injury, and on January 27, 2012, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act. On May 3, 2010, the Seoul Northern District Court issued a summary order of one million won for the crime of bodily injury; on April 5, 2010, the summary order of KRW 500,000 for the same court was issued for the crime of assault; and on December 4, 2012, 200 for the same court received a summary order of KRW 1 million for the crime of bodily injury, respectively.

1. Around 16:50 on August 8, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed in the frequency of “E” operated by the victim D (Woo, 61 years of age) located in Yong-si, Young-si; (b) expressed that the said victim would have changed the drinking value; and (c) expressed that the said victim would have changed the drinking value; and (d) the said victim would have changed to the drinking value; and (c) made a assault by taking the victim’s left side side of the drinking water at one time.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually assaults another person.

2. On August 8, 2015, at the same place as Paragraph 1, at around 16:55 on August 8, 2015, the Defendant: (a) stated that “an act of disturbance exists; (b)” in the manner described in Paragraph 1, “a person who was dispatched after having received 112 a report that he would pay the drinking value and return home to the Defendant; and (c) stated that “Chos debris frien fen fen fen fen fen fen fen fen fen f

The facts charged are stated as follows: "Seman's drinking was the one time price of the above G security guards." However, the police officers G and witness D are each police officers.