특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On August 6, 2013, at around 01:25, the Defendant driven a B rocketing car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.151% at a section of about 300 meters, from the same Do, to the road in front of the same dong-ro 95-3 beneficiary restaurant, from the Do near the vice-Dong-dong, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.
2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those who are engaged in driving B rocketing cars.
On August 6, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of 0.151% under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.151% on August 6, 2013, and led the Defendant to drive the said car at an intersection without signal signal, etc. in front of the licensed real estate agents of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government, Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.
At the time, there is a night and a place where an intersection without signal lights is installed in the front side, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving a motor vehicle driver by reducing speed and checking well the front side.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the victim to go beyond the ground on the front part of the front part of the pertinent car driving by the Defendant, who entered first the left side of the victim C(3) CA110E car, which was driven by the Defendant from the front part of the front part of the said car.
The Defendant continued to park on the front side of the press gate, which is the victim D owned by the Defendant, had the right part of the press gate, the right part of the press gate owned by the Defendant, left part of the Defendant’s front gate, and due to the shock, had the victim E, who was parked on the front side while the said press gate was pushed back in the future, and had the front part of the press gate lurged vehicle, which was owned by the victim E, the front part of the press lurged vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant is above.