도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Of the facts charged in this case, the prosecution against the violation of the Road Traffic Act is dismissed.
Punishment of the crime
On March 27, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the pure support of the Gwangju District Court. On October 22, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act ( sound driving) in the net fishing support of the Gwangju District Court on October 12, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the net fishing prison on October 12, 2012.
[2013 Highest 574]
1. The Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act, the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) from around November 16, 2012 to around 03:30 on November 28, 2012, the Defendant did not register the vehicle register in the vehicle register at approximately 70 km section from around 209 km at the center of the leisure hour, such as the road in front of 209, the speed limit from around November 16, 2012, and without a mandatory insurance policy, driven C rocketing car without a driver’s license.
2. Around 03:30 on November 28, 2012, the Defendant driven a vehicle specified in paragraph (1) while under the influence of alcohol at approximately 0.05% of alcohol content from a section of approximately 600 meters from the 969-18th road at the time of drinking water to the 301st road at the same time.
[2013 Height253]
3. On November 18, 2013, at around 03:12, the Defendant was driving a DNA low-water vehicle from the distance from the original raw ginseng distance, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.107% of the blood alcohol concentration at the 4-lane in front of a bus terminal located in the suburban bus in the summer-si city at a low time without a driver’s license.
4. No motor vehicle owner who has violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate an automobile which has not been subscribed to mandatory insurance;
The defendant, as a holder of D's low-income car, operated the car without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.
Summary of Evidence
[Each fact of paragraphs 1 and 2 at the Time of Sales]
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;
1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;
1. A report on detection of a host driver;
1. The register of driver's licenses;