Defendant

B Notwithstanding the fact that a person, other than a pharmacy founder, could not sell or obtain drugs for the purpose of sale, the Defendant sold to the above pharmacy around 14:45 on May 15, 2013, over-the-counter drugs to two customers who found the above pharmacy, and sold to the above pharmacy in 2,00 won.

B. Defendant A, at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph, sold drugs to Defendant B, who is an employee of the Defendant, in relation to the Defendant’s business.

2. According to the records of this case, the following facts can be acknowledged. A.

Defendant B, who was presumed to be so-called “Pampas” (hereinafter referred to as “Pampas”) entered the above pharmacy at the time as indicated in the facts charged, sold drugs in return for money to the Pampas, stating that Defendant B, “One liquor tax on the inside of the selling stand,” Defendant B, who read that “the head,” “Is the head, and then, I am a few to the outside of the selling stand,” and sold them.

B. At the same time, the above pharmacy, as a pharmacist, had only one pharmacist employed by Defendant A and his female, and there was no assistant other customer. When the above pharmacy entered a Pampas, Defendant A was off the clothes of the pharmacist in order for the above pharmacist to leave the pharmacy to be out from the outside.

C. Pampas was fluoring Defendant B with a flusium, and Defendant A flusium flusium up until Defendant B flusium was collected and delivered to the above customer, and Defendant B flusium flusium flusium flusium along Defendant B’s flusium, and Defendant B flusium flusium flusium, saying Defendant B’s flusium flusium with Defendant B’s flusium.