손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 4,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from December 30, 2014 to October 20, 2017 to the Plaintiff.
1. According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3 as to the plaintiff's liability for damages, the defendant reported that the plaintiff's son and son's son and son's son in the front side of the Seoul Northern Building around December 30, 2014 and reported that around 01:30 on December 30, 2014, the defendant suffered injury to the plaintiff by hand on the ground that the plaintiff left the plaintiff's her chest over the pushed floor and she got out of the pushed floor, and caused injury, such as internal f weeks of medical treatment.
Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the above violence.
2. Scope of damages.
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is seeking damages of KRW 20,01,00 as part of the claim, among KRW 30,938,722, KRW 17,000, KRW 700, KRW 700, KRW 10,000, KRW 30,938, and KRW 722.
(b) Actual income: 1,136,363 won (=1,00,000 ± 22 days of operation per month ¡À 22 days) x 25 days, and hereinafter the same shall apply;
[] Since the Plaintiff received hospitalized treatment for 25 days due to the instant injury, it is recognized that the Plaintiff lost income of KRW 17,00,000 per month for which the Plaintiff sought during the pertinent hospitalization period. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was unable to engage in one’s occupation due to the instant injury for 17 months from January 2015 to May 2016, and incurred total loss of KRW 17,000,000 in excess of the above recognition amount. However, in light of the record of evidence No. 5, appraisal commission by the Seoul Medical Center and the purport of the entire pleadings, it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff was deprived of labor ability beyond the above recognition amount, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to damages in excess of the above recognition amount is without merit. According to the overall purport of the Defendant’s arguments and arguments, the Plaintiff’s domestic violence from January 1, 2014 to December 15, 2014.