beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.08.31 2017나116010

사해행위취소

Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. Revocation of a debt repayment agreement concluded on May 7, 2015 between the Defendant and C.

3...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C-based comprehensive development”) on June 8, 2012.

) and the Qu Entertainment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Metainment”)

2) From the perspective of the construction of the aggregate housing in the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building.

B. On January 28, 2013, C filed a lawsuit against the Daejeon District Court 2013 Gohap2009 for the claim for construction cost. On December 18, 2013, and January 1, 2017, C jointly and severally revoked 63,876,210 won (i.e., 43,068,723 won added to the first instance trial) and damages for delay, and the said judgment became final and conclusive. C deposited the aforementioned provisional attachment with the Daejeon High Court 2050,705,74.74.75, supra, on the security of the right to claim for provisional attachment.

(2) On February 27, 2013, the Plaintiff.