If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

From January 1, 1996, the Defendant was in office as the representative director of Victim D Co., Ltd. (Co., Ltd., Ltd.) established for the purpose of mechanical manufacturing business, and around September 2009, the Defendant was appointed as a rehabilitation administrator due to the occurrence of rehabilitation procedures by the said company.

1. Around March 17, 2010, the Defendant withdrawn KRW 150,00,000, which was kept in the deposit account (G) in the name of the said company from the victim company located in Yong-Gun F of the Republic of Korea, in the name of the said company, and paid to the lesseeJ of the 703-dong 903-dong Y, Busan, the Defendant’s wife, as the name of return of the lease deposit to the lesseeJ of the 703-dong 90

2. On April 21, 2010, the Defendant withdrawn KRW 15,000,000, which was kept in the said deposit account by the said company, to L of the lessee of the said house in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, which is the Defendant’s possession, and withdraws KRW 30,000,000 from June 30, 2010 to M of the said house, and pays KRW 35,00,00,000 to N of the lessee of the said house as the name of return of the lease deposit, around March 23, 2012;

3. On April 28, 201, the Defendant deposited KRW 300,00,00 of the company’s income, such as proceeds from the sale of scrap metal generated during the work, and rent for a cafeteria, into the post office deposit account (Account P) in the name of the Defendant’s ASEAN, withdrawn in cash at that time, voluntarily consumed it under the name of living expenses, etc. from the temporary border to February 15, 2013, and used the company’s income equivalent to KRW 47,298,736 in the same way as in the list of crimes, in the same way as in the list of crimes, for an individual’s personal name.

Accordingly, the Defendant embezzled the property of the victim company.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police protocol on Q and R;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a detailed statement of deposit transactions, written determination of rehabilitation, and inquiry of details of deposit transactions;

1. Relevant Articles 356 and 355 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70 of the Criminal Act for the Detention of Labor House Head.