When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one shall transfer or acquire any means of access for the purpose of electronic financial transactions unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act.

Nevertheless, around December 4, 2018, the Defendant received a proposal from a person who has no personal name, stating that he/she will create a transaction performance and make a loan. On December 6, 2018, the Defendant delivered a letter of check card (B) linked to the account of the Defendant’s name under the name of the Defendant at the “Sanam Post Office” located in Sacheon-si, Sacheon-ro, 1130, Jacheon-do, Jacheon-ro, Jacheon-ro, 1130, along with the paper paper in which the password of the above account is written.

Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the means of access to electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reply to the execution of seizure warrants;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 49(4)1 and 6(3)1 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the fact that the means of access transferred by the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) was damaged by the use of the means of access for “singing”, the defendant transferred the means of access only though he was aware that it would be used for illegal days, and the defendant had the record of having been punished by the transfer of the previous means of access, and the conditions of various sentencing as shown in the argument in the instant case,