However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 20, 2017, the Defendant taken the side of the victim’s bridge, where the Defendant was unable to know his/her name he/she was seated because he/she was seated in the subway No. 2 of the C Station C located in the Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu, 2017, using his/her cellular phone with a short radius.

From that time until 18:00 of the same day, the Defendant taken photographs of the body of the victims who may cause sexual humiliations against their will using a cell phone with a total of 20 times as shown in the list of crimes attached hereto.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. A report on internal investigation (limited to attachment of gallon photographs of a suspected mobile phone taken by a reporter) - A mobile phone photographic;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (informating results of analysis of personalphones);

1. Article 14 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and the Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to attend a lecture;

1. Where a conviction becomes final and conclusive on the crime of violation of Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes in the judgment that is a sex offense subject to registration and submission of personal information under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the same Act, and the defendant is obligated to submit personal information to the head of the competent police office pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act.

The defendant's age, occupation, risk of recidivism, type, motive, process of the crime of this case, disclosure order or notification order of disclosure order is expected to be disadvantageous to the defendant due to the defendant's age, occupation, risk of recidivism.