해고무효확인 등
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
... 의뢰하였고, 학술단체협의회는 2012. 12. 6. 원고의 박사학위논문이 “1. A, (E대 대학원 P과 석사학위논문, 2005). 2. H, 『Q』(R, 2001). 3. H, 『S』(R, 2007).”을 표절하였다는 결론이 담긴 소견서를 회신하였는데, 학술단체협의회가 표절이라고 판단한 구체적인 논문표절 페이지와 표절 내용은 별지 [논문 표절 페이지 비교] 기재와 같고, 학술단체협의회의 원고의 박사학위 논문의 표절 여부에 관한 종합 소견은 다음과 같다.
* It is judged that the whole form of plagiarism, unauthorized plagiarism, plagiarism level, simple plagiarism level, etc. is very serious.
* In particular, in the case of Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 of the doctor's degree thesis, most of the contents of a master's degree thesis are cited without permission without indicating sources, which is bound to be without any research ethics.
* Section 98 of pages 98, 138 of pages refer to the research results of guidance professors almost as they are. Considering the fact that the practice of the architectural academic community and the permission of guidance professors was granted, it is considered inappropriate behavior as a researcher, and it cannot be free from suspicion to conceal plagiarism in comparison with the original.
* In the middle, it is visible to erroneously indicate the source in the middle, which is not the direct reference literature, but the possibility of being a phenomenon occurring in the plagiarism process.
* A doctor's degree thesis indicates the source of a master's degree thesis with respect to the contents of a master's degree thesis without disclosing sources in more peculiar matters, which is suspected of serious plagiarism in the case of a master's degree thesis.
These cases are 73 pages, 75 pages, 76 pages, 78, 81 pages, 82 pages, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 pages, 90 pages, 91, 94, 95, 106, 107, 110, 111, 115, 116, 120 pages, 121 pages.