The lower court convicted the Defendant of the instant facts charged.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the purpose of sexual intercourse in the crime of kidnapping sexual intercourse, failing to resist in the crime of quasi-rape, larceny, and the intention of unlawful acquisition in

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.