beta
서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.10 2019나14669

성공보수금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport:

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a person who purchased the Incheon apartment unit D in 234,100,000 won in the sale price, and the plaintiff was an attorney-at-law belonging to the law firm E.

B. On September 17, 2011, the Defendant entered into a contract to delegate the following cases to Law Firm E (hereinafter “instant delegation contract”).

The main contents of the instant delegation agreement are as follows.

(A) The Defendant is described as “A”, and Article 1 (Scope of Acceptance) “A”, Article 1 (Scope of Acceptance) “A” delegates the following cases to “B”, and the Defendant accepts the following cases:

Provided, That where a power of attorney is to be submitted to a government office, such as the court, A shall award the authority stated in a separate power of attorney to B.

(1) The indication of the case: The scope of acceptance of the case in so-called C case ( such as cancellation and cancellation of a sale contract, compensation for damages, and claim for restitution of unjust enrichment): Article 3 (Remuneration) A of the instant case’s principal lawsuit and preservation lawsuit in the first instance trial shall pay the remuneration and costs of lawsuit to B as follows:

(i) 200,000 won (including value added tax) contingent remuneration;

1.The amount calculated at the following rates, applying differential rates by economic interest value - below 5%: 7% of the economic interest value (including surtax; hereinafter the same shall apply) - The economic interest value is more than 5% but not more than 10%: 8% of the sale price - the economic interest value is more than 10% but not more than 15%: 9% of the sale price - the economic interest value is more than 15%: 10% of the sale price:

2. Time of payment: When money is received.

C. As an attorney at law firm E, the Plaintiff brought a lawsuit on behalf of the buyer of the instant apartment, including the Defendant, and was rendered a partial favorable judgment on February 1, 2013 ordering the payment of the purchase price equivalent to 12% as follows.

(hereinafter referred to as “related litigation”). Case number and case name: the other party, such as the Incheon District Court F, etc. and the return of sale price:

1. G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”).