beta
전주지방법원 2017.07.06 2017고단77

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 77"

1. On May 26, 2016, the Defendant had the victim D, who is a director of the (ju)C, perform a new construction work of accommodation facilities located in the north-gu, west-gu, west-gu, west-gu, and one parcel of land from E (ju) from (ju) to E (State) on the part of the State in which the expenses are paid. The Defendant would have the victim D subcontracted the construction work of electricity, telecommunication, and fire fighting in the said new construction work to KRW 780,000,000 from E (State) on the part of the State.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant did not have been delegated with the authority to select a subcontractor by the responsible person, such as the representative of E (State) and even if he received expenses from the injured person, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to allow the subcontractor to receive a subcontract for the construction of accommodation facilities located in the north-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from E (State) in E (State).

Nevertheless, on May 27, 2016, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the remittance of KRW 20 million from the victim to the new cooperation account under the G name on May 27, 2016.

2. The Defendant, on July 4, 2016, at the “I” hotel located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, and the victim D with “a three million won loaned and repaid.”

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, at the time of fact, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay even if he borrowed money from the damaged party due to no particular property or income.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 3 million won from the victim to the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the defendant on the same day.

Around September 2016, the Defendant stated that “Around May 2, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim J (“J”) that “A construction contract was made to build a hotel in the Embukdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-

However, it is true.