A. The facts of recognition 1) EPP construction contracted a construction site supervision and overall work process from EPP Industries Co., Ltd., and conducted the field supervision and overall work process. The Defendant supplied sewage to EPP construction from EP construction to EP, and the Plaintiff is the team leader employed for the Defendant. 2) On April 10, 2010, the Plaintiff fell from E, the head of the Defendant’s team, at the 2B-ray transformation department, the external steel structure of the instant construction site, at a height of the CG upper part (8 meters above this 8 meters) of CG-type, the safety labelling and the main safety stand at the outer wall of the transformation room, and attached the outer wall to the outer wall by fixing the outer wall a knife, the outer wall board, to C-type and the main safety fall into the following difference between C and C.

(hereinafter “instant accident”. The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as scarcity 11-12 and scarcity 12, and scarcity 12, and scarcity 12 due to the instant accident. The Plaintiff suffered injury to the Plaintiff, due to the scarcity 12, scarcity 12, and complete paralysis due to the dynaf damage.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 7 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. The Defendant, as the Plaintiff’s employer, thoroughly conducts safety education in advance when the Plaintiff’s work to attach a board on the outer wall at a height of eight meters above the ground, and bears the duty of safety consideration to maintain physical environment and to devise necessary measures so as not to harm life and physical health in the course of providing said labor. However, the Defendant may provide equipment, such as a “clicking vehicle,” which has a low risk of fall, actively supervise the click state of the fall prevention vehicle, or check whether there is a gap between the Chyeong and Ch class in which the instant accident occurred, and to fill the gap.