2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On February 2, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for manufacturing and installation (hereinafter “instant contract”) between the postal services procurement office and the contract amount of KRW 74,054,550, and the term of the contract from February 3, 2015 to April 10, 2015.

B. On April 7, 2015, the Plaintiff installed an automatic control system at the Gangnam Post Office (hereinafter “instant automatic control system”) and completed education and trial operation on the instant automatic control system on July 9, 2015.

C. On March 7, 2016, the Defendant revoked the confirmation of direct production of all items confirmed directly by the Plaintiff on March 9, 2016 pursuant to Article 11(2)3 and (3) of the Act on the Promotion of Purchase of Small and Medium Enterprise Products and the Support for Development of Market Support (hereinafter “Market Support Act”), on the ground that “The Defendant did not perform the essential production process while supplying them under the instant contract, and given them to the Korean control tower (hereinafter “Na control tower”) and produced them.”

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, entry in Gap’s Evidence Nos. 1, 3, 7, and 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. “Supply of clean production” under Article 11(2)3 of the Plaintiff’s 1st Market Support Act refers to the production and supply of all parts of the products which are the purpose of the contract through the subcontractor’s business.

비록 이 사건 자동제어장치 중 일부분을 나라컨트롤로부터 임가공 형식으로 납품받았으나, 원고는 현장제어반 내에 노이즈 필터 등을 설치하기 위한 설계 변경, 현장도면 작성, 위 노이즈 필터 등의 설치 및 관련 배선을 포함한 보완 공사, 운영 프로그램 수정, 시퀀스 분석 및 시험, 시운전, 관리직원의 교육 및 매뉴얼 제작까지 직접...