If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

On February 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) taken a taxi registered in the Seoul Metropolitan City, which was driven by C around the Manju apartment located in the Namyang-si, and (b) took a place to the Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu Seoul, his residence, and (c) took a look at the time on the ground that D, who took a registered taxi in the Namyang-si, who took a witness of the above boarding site, was in accordance with C’s taxi in order to verify whether the said C taxi was operated outside the jurisdiction of the said C taxi; and (d) came up to the Ecom

피고인은 2013. 2. 21. 23:20경 남양주시 F에 있는 남양주경찰서 E파출소에서 그곳에 근무하는 경찰관들에게 D가 자신을 따라오지 못하게 해 줄 것 등의 민원을 제기하여 경찰관들로부터 해당 민원을 해결할 수 있는 절차를 안내받았음에도 불구하고 경찰관들이 D의 편을 든다고 오해하고 격분하여 큰 소리로 욕설을 하면서 파출소 내에 설치된 파티션을 손으로 치는 등의 소란을 피웠고, 이에 경찰관들로부터 퇴거를 요구받고도 퇴거하지 아니하므로 경찰관들이 피고인을 퇴거시키기 위한 조치를 진행하던 중 발로 위 E파출소 소속 경찰관인 경사 G의 다리 부분을 2회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties related to the police box service, which includes the prevention of crimes and guidance on civil petitions by police officers who are public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and H;

1. The entry of witnesses G and I in the third protocol of trial;

1. Application of each statute of G, I, and H

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;